3/15/2024 0 Comments Epson perfection 4870ItĪctually takes me much less time to spot out an image in PS as longĪs it is relatively clean. Have grown so fed up of this I have taken to switching it off. Though ICE is a wonderfulįeature, it takes 26 minutes to scan a 35mm tranny at full res. Monolta and the Epson and there is a visible difference inĥ Terribly long scan times with ICE. I directly compared the same image scanned on the I would have to upgrade my systemĤ Visibly soft. Now, this onlyĪpplies to my OS which is older and the Vuescan version I use is no My preference would be a 4x pass (which shouldģ Didn't realise Vuescan won't support this scanner. This is kind of necessary to eliminate shadow noise and random noiseįrom a scan. Is largely due to my inability to multi-sample.Ģ Nobody mentioned you can't multi sample Horrified by all the artifacts that appear in the dark areas. I researched the purchase on the net as best I could but haveġ Nobody mentioned the TERRIBLE NOISY SHADOWSĪfter seeing crisp, clean shadows on the Minolta I am quite I use a Mac powerbook G3 500MHz with Mac OS 9.2 4000dpi is the minimum that can get 50 Mb from 35mm film.Īlso, because I shoot rollfilm and this scanner can scan all formats I need for library submissions that require file sizes (TIF) aroundĥ0Mb. The reason I went for the Epson - a resolution over 4000 dpi, which I bought one about a month ago as a replacement for my Minolta 5400 Paper, attractive compromise scanner for photographers. I wanted to post this review for other who are considering this, on
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |